shooting at Apalachee High School in Barrow County, Georgia, was released, I won’t watch it either.At first, it was simply because having those images as part of my memory wasn’t healthy for me. But as more traumatic images of death entered the public domain, I realized that each event returned me to that evening when my mom’s question made me understand how even once-ordinary people could be transformed into executioners, enacting the rawest and most intimate expressions of human carnage.That doesn’t mean I’m not paying attention, desensitized, or have checked out—quite the contrary. But in a country where moral progress has come on the literal backs of our mutilated bodies, I am aware that disturbing visuals of human suffering could be exploited for short-term sensationalism, which Black history warns doesn’t necessarily instigate lasting change.
One of the first graphic images to go viral was in 1863, two years into the Civil War. Military doctors from the Union Army were examining a man who had escaped from a plantation in Louisiana when they discovered gruesome scarring on his back. The man, Peter (formerly known as “Gordon”), had been horrifically whipped by an overseer.
The doctors documented “Peter’s Back,” and the image was published throughout the North, shocking naïve white people into reinterpreting the brutality of slavery, and reshaping the story of enslaved people in the imagination of Northerners.Thirty years after Peter, when Ida B. Wells-Barnett, then a young journalist, heard that a friend had been lynched, she decided to investigate mob violence in the South. Until her death in 1931, Wells-Barnett, one of the founders of the N.A.A.C.P., photographed, investigated, lobbied four presidents, and published about the thousands of victims of extrajudicial murders carried out by mobs during a century of terrorism.
President
death
shooting
man
country
shock
Investigations