list of cases it has decided to take or decline. It declined the case, Parents for Privacy v. Barr, without comment; the court very seldom includes comments on these orders.
The refusal to hear the case, however, means that it “failed to gain support from at least four justices,” The Hill reports.
The court last year declined to hear a similar case out of Pennsylvania, leaving another trans-inclusive policy in place.Parents of current or former students in the Dallas, Ore., school district, along with groups called Parents for Privacy and Parents Rights in Education, sued the district in 2017 after a transgender boy was allowed to use the boys’ restrooms and locker rooms at Dallas High School.