Kim Davis Samuel A.Alito-Junior Justice Thomas Justice Alito Washington state Kentucky city Davis Kim Davis Samuel A.Alito-Junior Justice Thomas Justice Alito Washington state Kentucky city Davis

Justices Thomas and Alito Question Same-Sex Marriage Precedent

Reading now: 625
nytimes.com

WASHINGTON — Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., who dissented from the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision establishing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, appeared to urge the court on Monday to reconsider the ruling, which they said had invented a right with no basis in the text of the Constitution. “By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the court has created a problem that only it can fix,” Justice Thomas wrote, in an opinion joined by Justice Alito.

The justices issued their opinion in a case concerning Kim Davis, a Kentucky county clerk who had been sued for refusing to issue marriage.

Read more on nytimes.com
The website meaws.com is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.

Related News

10.02 / 04:21
model pandemic This Party Stinks. That’s the Point.
Recent research may indicate that humans are more sensitive to body odor than our evolutionary ancestors were. Is this good news? It could be for Phillip Miner, a nightlife promoter who holds a party called “Pheromone” for armpit fetishists (the next will be held Feb. 10).
DMCA