The writer further said that Rebel's decision not to respond to the "discreet, genuine and honest queries" was "underwhelming" given how "bitterly she complained about poor journalism standards" when she successfully sued the publication, Women's Day, for defamation after they branded her a serial liar.FWIW, we also don't know if this is Rebel's first same-sex relationship or the extent of which she was openly queer in her private life.
Nor is it any of our business!I’ve just read this @smh piece 3 times to make sure that I wasn’t misreading. The publication messaged Rebel Wilson saying they would out her in 2 days - and is now complaining that she chose to announce her relationship with a woman herself.
Quite astonishing.i am so beyond disgusted at this. turns out rebel wilson only came out to avoid being forcefully outed and now that newspaper is pissed at her for ruining their scoop??
so they wrote this mess?? i am so angry and so sorry for rebel, no one deserves this.In case you were wondering how Pride Month is going, the @smh got in touch with Rebel Wilson to say they’d be outing her in the next few days, so when Rebel came out herself the journalists are throwing a tantrum that she robbed them of an exclusive.So apparently it wasn't @RebelWilson's choice to come out...