Pat Robertson Donald J.Trump New York state Texas Usa France Venezuela Haiti city Orlando Life Pat Robertson Donald J.Trump New York state Texas Usa France Venezuela Haiti city Orlando

Pat Robertson, who dedicated his life to promoting anti-LGBTQ+ hate, dies during Pride month

Reading now: 239
www.queerty.com

New York Times obituary:He suggested, for example, that Americans’ sinfulness had brought on the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States, and that the earthquake that devastated Haiti in 2010 was divine retribution for a promise that Haitians had made to serve the Devil in return for his help in securing the country’s independence from France in 1804.He said that liberal Protestants embodied “the spirit of the Antichrist” and that feminism drove women to witchcraft.

He called for the assassination of President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela. He maintained that his prayers had averted hurricanes.In December 2020, amid intensifying efforts by President Donald J.

Trump and his supporters to overturn the election, Mr. Robertson told viewers of his television show, “The 700 Club,” that a lawsuit filed by the Texas attorney general challenging results in four states was a “miracle.”“They’re going to the Supreme Court to say, ‘This election was rigged and you’ve got to overturn it,’” Mr.

Robertson said, citing unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. He declared that “God himself” would intervene.Barely two weeks later, he changed course. “The president still lives in an alternate reality,” he said, adding: “I think it would be well to say, ‘You’ve had your day and it’s time to move on.’”Oof.

Read more on queerty.com
The website meaws.com is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.

Related News

07.07 / 04:19
lgbtq President 2020 Gay With or without websites and cakes, we will continue to get married
History! That’s what this U.S. Supreme Court accomplished last Friday with its most recent decision toward the LGBTQ+ protected class. It’s the first time in history that a Supreme Court, despite the composition of its members, has restricted rights and benefits to a protected class instead of granting them more. The Supreme Court, throughout history, has been a tent to extend the interpretation of federal laws to give more rights and include more protected classes within them. Despite the immobility of Congress and the difficulties of getting new bills to become federal law, the Supreme Court has always found a way to create more jurisprudence to benefit vulnerable populations. Until now, unfortunately. 
DMCA